Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A

Estonia
9.0%
in 2018
Hong Kong, China
8.0%
in 2018
Estonia rank
51st
Hong Kong, China rank
54th

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A over time

  • Estonia
  • Hong Kong, China
02.557.510200020092018

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 9.0% against 8.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.0%.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 54th of 55 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 10.5% 6.5% 4.0% Estonia
2010s 8.3% 6.7% 1.7% Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a, Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
Estonia, at 9.0% against 8.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
1.0%, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1a?
Estonia ranks 51st and Hong Kong, China ranks 54th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid, drawing on OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/pisa-15-year-olds-by-reading-proficiency-level-percent-level-1a/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1A
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 349 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 335 but lower than or equal to 407 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1a can understand the literal meaning of sentences or short passages. Readers at this level can also recognize the main theme or the author’s purpose in a piece of text about a familiar topic, and make a simple connection between several adjacent pieces of information, or between the given information and their own prior knowledge. They can select a relevant page from a small set based on simple prompts, and locate one or more independent pieces of information within short texts. Level 1a readers can reflect on the overall purpose and on the relative importance of information (e.g. the main idea vs. non-essential detail) in simple texts containing explicit cues. Most tasks at this level contain explicit cues regarding what needs to be done, how to do it, and where in the text(s) readers should focus their attention. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 1 data have been included in this database as Level 1A because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/