Indonesia vs Jordan: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4 over time
- Indonesia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 3.6% against 2.3% in Indonesia, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.6 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 51st and Jordan ranks 48th of 53 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 2.2% | 0.3% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 2.5% | 0.3% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4, Indonesia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 3.6% against 2.3% in Indonesia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4 between Indonesia and Jordan?
- 1.3%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Indonesia and Jordan rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4?
- Indonesia ranks 51st and Jordan ranks 48th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 545 but lower than or equal to 607 on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 4, students can work effectively with explicit models for complex concrete situations that may involve constraints or call for making assumptions. They can select and integrate different representations, including symbolic, linking them directly to aspects of real-world situations. Students at this level can utilize their limited range of skills and can reason with some insight, in straightforward contexts. They can construct and communicate explanations and arguments based on their interpretations, arguments, and actions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/