Greece vs Israel: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4 over time
- Greece
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 15.4% against 11.1% in Greece, a difference of 4.3%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.4 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 38th and Israel ranks 35th of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.1% | 11.9% | 1.2% | Greece |
| 2010s | 11.5% | 15.4% | 3.9% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4, Greece or Israel?
- Israel, at 15.4% against 11.1% in Greece as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4 between Greece and Israel?
- 4.3%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Greece and Israel rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 4?
- Greece ranks 38th and Israel ranks 35th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 545 but lower than or equal to 607 on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 4, students can work effectively with explicit models for complex concrete situations that may involve constraints or call for making assumptions. They can select and integrate different representations, including symbolic, linking them directly to aspects of real-world situations. Students at this level can utilize their limited range of skills and can reason with some insight, in straightforward contexts. They can construct and communicate explanations and arguments based on their interpretations, arguments, and actions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/