Argentina vs Indonesia: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Argentina
- Indonesia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 8.8% against 6.8% in Indonesia, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.7% | 8.0% | 2.7% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 7.0% | 3.4% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3, Argentina or Indonesia?
- Argentina, at 8.8% against 6.8% in Indonesia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3 between Argentina and Indonesia?
- 2.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Indonesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Indonesia rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Argentina ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/