Low income vs Nepal: Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education
Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education over time
- Low income
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 45.7% against 23.4% in Low income, a difference of 22.3%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 2.0 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 8th of 41 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.2% | 23.8% | 1.5% | Low income |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 37.3% | 13.5% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education, Low income or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 45.7% against 23.4% in Low income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education between Low income and Nepal?
- 22.3%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Low income and Nepal rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education?
- Low income ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 8th of 41 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in each level of education (primary and lower secondary general education) who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. The value is calculated as the sum of enrolments across all grades in the given level of education which are 2 or more years older than the intended age for the given grade is expressed as a percentage of the total enrolment in the given level of education. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/