China vs Guatemala: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

China
4
in 2018
Guatemala
4
in 2018
China rank
1st
Guatemala rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • China
  • Guatemala
01234180019092018

How they compare

China currently reports 4 against 4 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 164 shared years of data; in 1839 it was China ahead.

China ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, China averaged higher in 7 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Guatemala Difference Ahead
1830s 1 0 1 China
1840s 1 0 1 China
1850s 1 0 1 China
1860s 1 0 1 China
1870s 1 2 1 Guatemala
1880s 1 4 3 Guatemala
1890s 1 3.2 2.2 Guatemala
1900s 1 4 3 Guatemala
1910s 3.12 4 0.875 Guatemala
1920s 4 4 0 —
1930s 4 4 0 —
1940s 4 4 0 —
1950s 4 2.4 1.6 China
1960s 4 2.8 1.2 China
1970s 4 4 0 —
1980s 4 2.67 1.33 China
1990s 4 4 0 —
2000s 4 4 0 —
2010s 4 4 0 —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, China or Guatemala?
China, at 4 against 4 in Guatemala as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between China and Guatemala?
0, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Guatemala?
164 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2018.
How do China and Guatemala rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
China ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Guatemala: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid, drawing on Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/china/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/china/guatemala/">China vs Guatemala: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).