Côte d'Ivoire vs Ghana: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure

Côte d'Ivoire
22.0%
in 2018
Ghana
20.3%
in 2012
Côte d'Ivoire rank
15th
Ghana rank
16th

Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Ghana
0204060200420112018

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 22.0% against 20.3% in Ghana, a difference of 1.7%.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 15th and Ghana ranks 16th of 55 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Ghana Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5% 44.1% 41.6% Ghana
2010s 2.0% 37.2% 35.2% Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Côte d'Ivoire or Ghana?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 22.0% against 20.3% in Ghana as of 2018.
What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana?
1.7%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana?
6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2012.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 15th and Ghana ranks 16th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Ghana: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-pre-primary/cote-d-ivoire/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-pre-primary/cote-d-ivoire/ghana/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Ghana: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 611 data points, 1998–2019
Last refreshed

Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/