Low & middle income vs Portugal: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Low & middle income
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 109.0% against 93.9% in Low & middle income, a difference of 15.1%.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 27th of 45 groups.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.9% | 117.0% | 35.1% | Portugal |
| 2000s | 88.6% | 115.4% | 26.8% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 95.0% | 109.2% | 14.2% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Low & middle income or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 109.0% against 93.9% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Low & middle income and Portugal?
- 15.1%, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Portugal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Low & middle income and Portugal rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Low & middle income ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 27th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.