Low & middle income vs Viet Nam: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Low & middle income
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 109.2% against 94.8% in Low & middle income, a difference of 14.4%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Low & middle income ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 28th of 45 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.8% | 98.1% | 11.3% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 91.4% | 95.0% | 3.6% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 95.4% | 103.1% | 7.7% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Low & middle income or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 109.2% against 94.8% in Low & middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Low & middle income and Viet Nam?
- 14.4%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Low & middle income and Viet Nam rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Low & middle income ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 28th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.