Denmark vs Slovenia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Denmark
61.1%
in 2018
Slovenia
61.9%
in 2018
Denmark rank
7th
Slovenia rank
6th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Denmark
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 61.9% against 61.1% in Denmark, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovenia ahead.
Denmark ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 6th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 27.7% | 27.7% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 60.7% | 57.1% | 3.6% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Denmark or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 61.9% against 61.1% in Denmark as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Denmark and Slovenia?
- 0.8%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Slovenia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Denmark ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 6th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.