Cuba vs Norway: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Cuba
89.0%
in 2019
Norway
84.9%
in 2018
Cuba rank
2nd
Norway rank
3rd
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Cuba
- Norway
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 89.0% against 84.9% in Norway, a difference of 4.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 2nd and Norway ranks 3rd of 174 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.5% | 0.0% | 88.5% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 84.3% | 0.0% | 84.3% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 87.3% | 61.6% | 25.7% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Cuba or Norway?
- Cuba, at 89.0% against 84.9% in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Cuba and Norway?
- 4.1%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Cuba ranks 2nd and Norway ranks 3rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.