Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mongolia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Mongolia
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 68th and Mongolia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Democratic Republic of Congo or Mongolia?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mongolia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Democratic Republic of Congo and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Mongolia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 68th and Mongolia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.