Guatemala vs Hong Kong: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Guatemala
1.4%
in 2019
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
66th
Hong Kong rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Guatemala
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.4% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Guatemala ranks 66th and Hong Kong ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 8.7% | 8.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 0.0% | 1.6% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Guatemala or Hong Kong?
- Guatemala, at 1.4% against 0.0% in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Guatemala and Hong Kong?
- 1.4%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Hong Kong?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Hong Kong rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Guatemala ranks 66th and Hong Kong ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.