Argentina vs Azerbaijan: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Argentina
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 6.0% against 5.5% in Argentina, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Azerbaijan ranks 54th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Azerbaijan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6% | 6.6% | 3.0% | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 4.4% | 0.6% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Argentina or Azerbaijan?
- Azerbaijan, at 6.0% against 5.5% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 0.5%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2016.
- How do Argentina and Azerbaijan rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Azerbaijan ranks 54th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.