Panama vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development

Panama
1.03 GPIA
in 2017
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.04 GPIA
in 2016
Panama rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
12th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time

  • Panama
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.250.50.751199920082017

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 1.04 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in Panama, a difference of 0.01 GPIA.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Panama ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 12th of 173 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
2000s 0 GPIA 0.8711 GPIA 0.8711 GPIA Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 0.5625 GPIA 0.9031 GPIA 0.3406 GPIA Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Panama or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), at 1.04 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in Panama as of 2016.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Panama and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.01 GPIA, with Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
How do Panama and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
Panama ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 12th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/panama/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/panama/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Panama vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 2,956 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/