Mongolia vs Suriname: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Mongolia
- Suriname
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Suriname, a difference of 0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 138th of 204 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
| 2000s | -0.5626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
| 2010s | -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
| 2020s | -0.3431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Mongolia or Suriname?
- Mongolia, at -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Mongolia and Suriname?
- 0.0651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Suriname rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 138th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.