Mauritius vs Saudi Arabia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Mauritius
0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.7833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritius rank
48th
Saudi Arabia rank
46th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Mauritius
  • Saudi Arabia
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.7833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 48th and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 204 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2000s 0.6232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2010s 0.943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.7784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Mauritius or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.7833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Mauritius and Saudi Arabia?
0.0179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saudi Arabia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Saudi Arabia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Mauritius ranks 48th and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Saudi Arabia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/saudi-arabia/">Mauritius vs Saudi Arabia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.