Madagascar vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Madagascar
- Nepal
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports -0.8632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nepal ahead.
Madagascar ranks 166th and Nepal ranks 169th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nepal |
| 2000s | -0.6326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.8642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | -0.9178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Madagascar or Nepal?
- Madagascar, at -0.8632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Madagascar and Nepal?
- 0.0213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Nepal rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Madagascar ranks 166th and Nepal ranks 169th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.