Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | -0.7972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | -0.8639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kyrgyzstan or Timor-Leste?
- Kyrgyzstan, at -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
- 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.