Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Kyrgyzstan
-0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
172nd
Papua New Guinea rank
174th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Papua New Guinea
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 172nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2000s -0.721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2010s -0.7972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2020s -0.8639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kyrgyzstan or Papua New Guinea?
Kyrgyzstan, at -0.8885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
0.0119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 172nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,161 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.