Kiribati vs Zambia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Zambia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.0988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 137th and Zambia ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.5006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | -0.322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kiribati or Zambia?
- Kiribati, at -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kiribati and Zambia?
- 0.0988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Zambia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 137th and Zambia ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.