Kiribati vs Mongolia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 137th and Mongolia ranks 136th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.5006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | -0.322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kiribati or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 0.0451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 137th and Mongolia ranks 136th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.