Bhutan vs Oman: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Bhutan
- Oman
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.5808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman, a difference of 0.0133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Oman ahead.
Bhutan ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 63rd of 204 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1304 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.2652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1855 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.4793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.5462 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Bhutan or Oman?
- Bhutan, at 0.5808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Bhutan and Oman?
- 0.0133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Oman?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Oman rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 63rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.