Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Bhutan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bhutan is 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 22.6% on the previous year and up 79.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bhutan peaked at 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.1674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2006.
Bhutan ranks 56th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.1921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.5% |
| 2000 | 0.1913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2002 | 0.1981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2003 | 0.1943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2004 | 0.2626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.1% |
| 2005 | 0.3613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.6% |
| 2006 | 0.1674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -53.7% |
| 2007 | 0.1816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.5% |
| 2008 | 0.2972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +63.6% |
| 2009 | 0.3687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.1% |
| 2010 | 0.4106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0.4461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 0.505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.2% |
| 2013 | 0.6293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.6% |
| 2014 | 0.4414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.9% |
| 2015 | 0.3922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.2% |
| 2016 | 0.459 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.3% |
| 2018 | 0.6203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.2% |
| 2019 | 0.5745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.4% |
| 2020 | 0.5793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 0.672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.0% |
| 2022 | 0.556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.5756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2025 | 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.6% |
Bhutan compared with similar countries
- Bhutan's 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Bhutan's 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for South Asia, which is -0.1848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.5008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 53 Seychelles 0.7655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 54 Malta 0.763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Saudi Arabia 0.7395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 57 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.6992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 58 Bahamas 0.6491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 59 China 0.6238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bhutan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bhutan was 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- How does Bhutan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 56th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 79.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.