Belarus, Republic of vs Uganda: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2

Belarus, Republic of
35,072
in 2015
Uganda
29,522
in 2015
Belarus, Republic of rank
46th
Uganda rank
49th

GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2 over time

  • Belarus, Republic of
  • Uganda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020022015

How they compare

Belarus, Republic of currently reports 35,072 against 29,522 in Uganda, a difference of 5,550.

That makes Belarus, Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Belarus, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 49th of 202 countries.

Belarus, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus, Republic of Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 35,839 22,213 13,626 Belarus, Republic of
2000s 33,571 25,178 8,393 Belarus, Republic of
2010s 34,140 28,713 5,427 Belarus, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2, Belarus, Republic of or Uganda?
Belarus, Republic of, at 35,072 against 29,522 in Uganda as of 2015.
What is the difference in ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2 between Belarus, Republic of and Uganda?
5,550, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Uganda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Belarus, Republic of and Uganda rank globally for ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 49th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus, Republic of vs Uganda: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/belarus/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/belarus/uganda/">Belarus, Republic of vs Uganda: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,304 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

GHG emissions from food systems disaggregated by gas are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).