Finland vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Finland
23.5 Production
in 2015
Ukraine
26.33 Production
in 2015
Finland rank
69th
Ukraine rank
66th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Finland
  • Ukraine
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 26.33 Production against 23.5 Production in Finland, a difference of 2.83 Production.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 69th and Ukraine ranks 66th of 179 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 19.68 Production 10.66 Production 9.01 Production Finland
2000s 53.1 Production 16.93 Production 36.17 Production Finland
2010s 27.74 Production 19.38 Production 8.36 Production Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Finland or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 26.33 Production against 23.5 Production in Finland as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Finland and Ukraine?
2.83 Production, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Ukraine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Finland and Ukraine rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Finland ranks 69th and Ukraine ranks 66th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/finland/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/finland/ukraine/">Finland vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).