Cyprus vs Czechia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Cyprus
0.3249 Production
in 2015
Czechia
0.513 Production
in 2015
Cyprus rank
147th
Czechia rank
144th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Cyprus
  • Czechia
00.20.40.6199020022015

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.513 Production against 0.3249 Production in Cyprus, a difference of 0.1881 Production.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.6 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.

Cyprus ranks 147th and Czechia ranks 144th of 179 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0024 Production 0.4808 Production 0.4784 Production Czechia
2000s 0.3981 Production 0.4968 Production 0.0987 Production Czechia
2010s 0.3538 Production 0.5224 Production 0.1686 Production Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Cyprus or Czechia?
Czechia, at 0.513 Production against 0.3249 Production in Cyprus as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Cyprus and Czechia?
0.1881 Production, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Czechia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Cyprus and Czechia rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Cyprus ranks 147th and Czechia ranks 144th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Czechia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/cyprus/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/cyprus/czechia/">Cyprus vs Czechia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).