China vs Uruguay: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

China
0.3162 Production
in 2015
Uruguay
0.4637 Production
in 2015
China rank
148th
Uruguay rank
146th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • China
  • Uruguay
0.20.40.60.811.2199020022015

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.4637 Production against 0.3162 Production in China, a difference of 0.1475 Production.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times China's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.

China ranks 148th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 179 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4947 Production 0.5431 Production 0.0484 Production Uruguay
2000s 0.542 Production 0.6519 Production 0.1099 Production Uruguay
2010s 0.3732 Production 0.4652 Production 0.092 Production Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, China or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.4637 Production against 0.3162 Production in China as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between China and Uruguay?
0.1475 Production, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do China and Uruguay rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
China ranks 148th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Uruguay: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/china/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/china/uruguay/">China vs Uruguay: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).