Cambodia vs Mongolia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Cambodia
49.21 Production
in 2015
Mongolia
49.39 Production
in 2015
Cambodia rank
42nd
Mongolia rank
41st

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Cambodia
  • Mongolia
203040506070199020022015

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 49.39 Production against 49.21 Production in Cambodia, a difference of 0.18 Production.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 41st of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 57.93 Production 61.08 Production 3.15 Production Mongolia
2000s 53.73 Production 50.98 Production 2.75 Production Cambodia
2010s 47.49 Production 45.48 Production 2.01 Production Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Cambodia or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 49.39 Production against 49.21 Production in Cambodia as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Cambodia and Mongolia?
0.18 Production, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Cambodia and Mongolia rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Cambodia ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 41st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Mongolia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/cambodia/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/cambodia/mongolia/">Cambodia vs Mongolia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).