Burundi vs Myanmar: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Burundi
54.95 Production
in 2015
Myanmar
58.06 Production
in 2015
Burundi rank
36th
Myanmar rank
33rd

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Burundi
  • Myanmar
020406080199020022015

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 58.06 Production against 54.95 Production in Burundi, a difference of 3.11 Production.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 36th and Myanmar ranks 33rd of 179 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 81.23 Production 64.05 Production 17.17 Production Burundi
2000s 72.45 Production 53.58 Production 18.87 Production Burundi
2010s 58.03 Production 57.03 Production 0.9954 Production Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Burundi or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 58.06 Production against 54.95 Production in Burundi as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Burundi and Myanmar?
3.11 Production, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Myanmar?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Burundi and Myanmar rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Burundi ranks 36th and Myanmar ranks 33rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Myanmar: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/burundi/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/burundi/myanmar/">Burundi vs Myanmar: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).