Botswana vs Isle of Man: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Botswana
96.59 Production
in 2015
Isle of Man
100 Production
in 2015
Botswana rank
4th
Isle of Man rank
1st

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Botswana
  • Isle of Man
020406080100199020022015

How they compare

Isle of Man currently reports 100 Production against 96.59 Production in Botswana, a difference of 3.41 Production.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Isle of Man has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 4th and Isle of Man ranks 1st of 179 countries.

Isle of Man has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Isle of Man Difference Ahead
1990s 93.01 Production 100 Production 6.99 Production Isle of Man
2000s 91.48 Production 100 Production 8.52 Production Isle of Man
2010s 88.26 Production 100 Production 11.74 Production Isle of Man

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Botswana or Isle of Man?
Isle of Man, at 100 Production against 96.59 Production in Botswana as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Botswana and Isle of Man?
3.41 Production, with Isle of Man ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Isle of Man?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Botswana and Isle of Man rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Botswana ranks 4th and Isle of Man ranks 1st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Isle of Man: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/botswana/isle-of-man/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/botswana/isle-of-man/">Botswana vs Isle of Man: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).