Belarus vs Malawi: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Belarus
41.79 Production
in 2015
Malawi
45.36 Production
in 2015
Belarus rank
54th
Malawi rank
52nd

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Belarus
  • Malawi
020406080199020022015

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 45.36 Production against 41.79 Production in Belarus, a difference of 3.57 Production.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 179 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 39.8 Production 69.7 Production 29.9 Production Malawi
2000s 45.04 Production 67.45 Production 22.41 Production Malawi
2010s 40.43 Production 50.11 Production 9.68 Production Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Belarus or Malawi?
Malawi, at 45.36 Production against 41.79 Production in Belarus as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Belarus and Malawi?
3.57 Production, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Belarus and Malawi rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Belarus ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Malawi: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/belarus/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/belarus/malawi/">Belarus vs Malawi: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).