Australia vs Uzbekistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Australia
2.94 Production
in 2015
Uzbekistan
2.92 Production
in 2015
Australia rank
120th
Uzbekistan rank
121st

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Australia
  • Uzbekistan
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2.94 Production against 2.92 Production in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.02 Production.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 121st of 179 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 5.14 Production 0.337 Production 4.8 Production Australia
2000s 37.49 Production 0.4508 Production 37.04 Production Australia
2010s 11.8 Production 2.01 Production 9.79 Production Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Australia or Uzbekistan?
Australia, at 2.94 Production against 2.92 Production in Uzbekistan as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Australia and Uzbekistan?
0.02 Production, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uzbekistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Australia and Uzbekistan rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Australia ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 121st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uzbekistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/australia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/australia/uzbekistan/">Australia vs Uzbekistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).