Singapore vs Syrian Arab Republic: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption

Singapore
4.1
in 2015
Syrian Arab Republic
4.09
in 2015
Singapore rank
48th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
49th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption over time

  • Singapore
  • Syrian Arab Republic
02.557.510199020022015

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 4.1 against 4.09 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 48th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 49th of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 8.63 7.23 1.41 Singapore
2000s 5.82 6.79 0.9675 Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 4.2 5.04 0.8368 Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption, Singapore or Syrian Arab Republic?
Singapore, at 4.1 against 4.09 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption between Singapore and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.01, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Syrian Arab Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Singapore and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption?
Singapore ranks 48th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 49th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Syrian Arab Republic: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/singapore/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/singapore/syrian-arab-republic/">Singapore vs Syrian Arab Republic: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 5,054 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).