Kiribati vs Mauritius: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Kiribati
0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritius
0.3405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kiribati rank
73rd
Mauritius rank
75th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Kiribati
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.6199620102024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 73rd and Mauritius ranks 75th of 204 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2010s 0.2266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.3452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Kiribati or Mauritius?
Kiribati, at 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Kiribati and Mauritius?
0.0341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mauritius?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Mauritius rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Kiribati ranks 73rd and Mauritius ranks 75th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Mauritius: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kiribati/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kiribati/mauritius/">Kiribati vs Mauritius: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.