Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Mauritius, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritius is 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.8% on the previous year and up 34.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritius peaked at 0.5628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Mauritius ranks 73rd of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.4503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2000 | 0.3718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.4% |
| 2002 | 0.4115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.7% |
| 2003 | 0.347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.7% |
| 2004 | 0.215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.0% |
| 2005 | 0.2442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.6% |
| 2006 | 0.398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +63.0% |
| 2007 | 0.3574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.2% |
| 2008 | 0.5628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +57.5% |
| 2009 | 0.5292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.0% |
| 2010 | 0.3242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.7% |
| 2011 | 0.2637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +48.3% |
| 2013 | 0.3726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2014 | 0.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.5% |
| 2015 | 0.2924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.4% |
| 2016 | 0.3248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.1% |
| 2017 | 0.2787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.2% |
| 2018 | 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.9% |
| 2019 | 0.3254 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.2% |
| 2020 | 0.3457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2021 | 0.4205 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.6% |
| 2022 | 0.396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2023 | 0.3524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2024 | 0.3956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.3% |
| 2025 | 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.3328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4205 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 70 Oman 0.503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 71 Saint Lucia 0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 72 Nauru 0.4567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 74 Marshall Islands 0.3548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 75 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 76 Jordan 0.3033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritius?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Mauritius was 0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Mauritius rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Mauritius ranks 73rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.