Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Kiribati, 2004–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2025.
That represents a change of down 21.6% on the previous year and up 3.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati peaked at 0.4372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.
That places Kiribati 77th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0.4372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2005 | 0.3224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.2484 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.9% |
| 2007 | 0.2843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.4% |
| 2008 | 0.0969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -65.9% |
| 2009 | -0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -104.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1735.1% |
| 2011 | 0.2389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +233.2% |
| 2012 | 0.1486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -37.8% |
| 2013 | 0.1488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 0.2846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +91.2% |
| 2015 | 0.2869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 0.2556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2017 | 0.2543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.2565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 0.3546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.3% |
| 2020 | 0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.3415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2022 | 0.3361 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2023 | 0.337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 0.3783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.2% |
| 2025 | 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.6% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.3258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 91% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | +1735.1% | -0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2011 | +233.2% | 0.0717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.2301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 74 Marshall Islands 0.3548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 75 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 76 Jordan 0.3033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 78 Kuwait 0.2831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 79 Bahrain 0.2813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 80 Greece 0.2505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0058 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0086 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0288 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0202 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati was 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- How does Kiribati rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 77th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.