Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Kiribati
Kiribati: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Kiribati, 2004–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2024.
That represents a change of up 12.9% on the previous year and up 32.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati peaked at 0.4368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.
That places Kiribati 73rd out of 205 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0.4368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2005 | 0.3218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.3% |
| 2006 | 0.2439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.2% |
| 2007 | 0.2817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -66.4% |
| 2009 | -0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -108.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -998.8% |
| 2011 | 0.2357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +244.2% |
| 2012 | 0.1454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.3% |
| 2013 | 0.1456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.2821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +93.7% |
| 2015 | 0.2843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 0.2513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.6% |
| 2017 | 0.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.2522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 0.3505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.0% |
| 2020 | 0.3514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 0.3344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2022 | 0.3338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.3318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2024 | 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.9% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.4446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 84% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Kiribati changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | +998.8% | -0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2011 | +244.2% | 0.0685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.2266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 70 Puerto Rico 0.3977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 71 Marshall Islands 0.3907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 72 Georgia 0.3811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 74 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.3481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 75 Mauritius 0.3405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 76 Greece 0.2997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0058 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0086 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0288 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0202 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Kiribati was 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- How does Kiribati rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 73rd out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.