Lebanon vs Myanmar: Clientelism Index
Lebanon
0.882
in 2025
Myanmar
0.878
in 2025
Lebanon rank
6th
Myanmar rank
8th
Clientelism Index over time
- Lebanon
- Myanmar
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.882 against 0.878 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.004.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 176 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.753 | 0.317 | 0.436 | Lebanon |
| 1920s | 0.759 | 0.3013 | 0.4577 | Lebanon |
| 1930s | 0.759 | 0.2968 | 0.4622 | Lebanon |
| 1940s | 0.8095 | 0.3769 | 0.4326 | Lebanon |
| 1950s | 0.8399 | 0.4427 | 0.3972 | Lebanon |
| 1960s | 0.8364 | 0.6075 | 0.2289 | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 0.859 | 0.7235 | 0.1355 | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 0.865 | 0.7521 | 0.1129 | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 0.8528 | 0.7013 | 0.1515 | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 0.8657 | 0.702 | 0.1637 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 0.8489 | 0.5121 | 0.3368 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0.8525 | 0.6515 | 0.201 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Lebanon or Myanmar?
- Lebanon, at 0.882 against 0.878 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Lebanon and Myanmar?
- 0.004, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Myanmar?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Lebanon and Myanmar rank globally for clientelism index?
- Lebanon ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.