Laos vs Maldives: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Laos
552.19 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Maldives
536.91 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Laos rank
19th
Maldives rank
21st

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Laos
  • Maldives
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Laos currently reports 552.19 kilograms per year per capita against 536.91 kilograms per year per capita in Maldives, a difference of 15.28 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Laos ranks 19th and Maldives ranks 21st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 55.72 kilograms per year per capita 228.75 kilograms per year per capita 173.03 kilograms per year per capita Maldives
1970s 39.58 kilograms per year per capita 261.68 kilograms per year per capita 222.1 kilograms per year per capita Maldives
1980s 35.75 kilograms per year per capita 248.11 kilograms per year per capita 212.36 kilograms per year per capita Maldives
1990s 59.89 kilograms per year per capita 99.89 kilograms per year per capita 40 kilograms per year per capita Maldives
2000s 329.94 kilograms per year per capita 180.18 kilograms per year per capita 149.76 kilograms per year per capita Laos
2010s 566.62 kilograms per year per capita 332.73 kilograms per year per capita 233.88 kilograms per year per capita Laos
2020s 554.99 kilograms per year per capita 448.85 kilograms per year per capita 106.14 kilograms per year per capita Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Laos or Maldives?
Laos, at 552.19 kilograms per year per capita against 536.91 kilograms per year per capita in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Laos and Maldives?
15.28 kilograms per year per capita, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Maldives?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Laos and Maldives rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Laos ranks 19th and Maldives ranks 21st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Laos vs Maldives: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/lao-pdr/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/lao-pdr/maldives/">Laos vs Maldives: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.