Fiji vs Portugal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Fiji
356.77 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Portugal
348.14 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Fiji rank
63rd
Portugal rank
66th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Fiji
  • Portugal
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 356.77 kilograms per year per capita against 348.14 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal, a difference of 8.63 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Fiji ranks 63rd and Portugal ranks 66th of 192 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 30.77 kilograms per year per capita 322.68 kilograms per year per capita 291.92 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1970s 40.67 kilograms per year per capita 358.31 kilograms per year per capita 317.64 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1980s 45.51 kilograms per year per capita 360.28 kilograms per year per capita 314.76 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1990s 79.34 kilograms per year per capita 466.81 kilograms per year per capita 387.47 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2000s 113.57 kilograms per year per capita 487.97 kilograms per year per capita 374.39 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2010s 174 kilograms per year per capita 411.4 kilograms per year per capita 237.4 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2020s 298.21 kilograms per year per capita 312.19 kilograms per year per capita 13.98 kilograms per year per capita Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Fiji or Portugal?
Fiji, at 356.77 kilograms per year per capita against 348.14 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Fiji and Portugal?
8.63 kilograms per year per capita, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Portugal rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Fiji ranks 63rd and Portugal ranks 66th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Portugal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/fiji/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/fiji/portugal/">Fiji vs Portugal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.