Grenada vs Maldives: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Grenada
438.87 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Maldives
461.7 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Grenada rank
18th
Maldives rank
15th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Grenada
  • Maldives
100200300400500600196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 461.7 kilograms per year per capita against 438.87 kilograms per year per capita in Grenada, a difference of 22.83 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 18th and Maldives ranks 15th of 192 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 370.18 kilograms per year per capita 126.38 kilograms per year per capita 243.8 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1970s 366.34 kilograms per year per capita 131.42 kilograms per year per capita 234.92 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1980s 375.48 kilograms per year per capita 123.92 kilograms per year per capita 251.56 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
1990s 439.36 kilograms per year per capita 157.88 kilograms per year per capita 281.48 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
2000s 393.07 kilograms per year per capita 228.7 kilograms per year per capita 164.37 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
2010s 441.59 kilograms per year per capita 384.28 kilograms per year per capita 57.31 kilograms per year per capita Grenada
2020s 434.93 kilograms per year per capita 431.46 kilograms per year per capita 3.47 kilograms per year per capita Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Grenada or Maldives?
Maldives, at 461.7 kilograms per year per capita against 438.87 kilograms per year per capita in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Grenada and Maldives?
22.83 kilograms per year per capita, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Maldives?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Maldives rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Grenada ranks 18th and Maldives ranks 15th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Maldives: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/grenada/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/grenada/maldives/">Grenada vs Maldives: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.