Ecuador vs Kenya: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Ecuador
220.32 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Kenya
217.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Ecuador rank
101st
Kenya rank
103rd

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kenya
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 220.32 kilograms per year per capita against 217.03 kilograms per year per capita in Kenya, a difference of 3.29 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 101st and Kenya ranks 103rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 715.26 kilograms per year per capita 134.73 kilograms per year per capita 580.53 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
1970s 674.22 kilograms per year per capita 97.07 kilograms per year per capita 577.15 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
1980s 584.69 kilograms per year per capita 139.83 kilograms per year per capita 444.86 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
1990s 517.17 kilograms per year per capita 144.39 kilograms per year per capita 372.78 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
2000s 442.84 kilograms per year per capita 159.33 kilograms per year per capita 283.51 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
2010s 231.82 kilograms per year per capita 153.11 kilograms per year per capita 78.71 kilograms per year per capita Ecuador
2020s 177.59 kilograms per year per capita 186.09 kilograms per year per capita 8.49 kilograms per year per capita Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Ecuador or Kenya?
Ecuador, at 220.32 kilograms per year per capita against 217.03 kilograms per year per capita in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Ecuador and Kenya?
3.29 kilograms per year per capita, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Ecuador ranks 101st and Kenya ranks 103rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kenya: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/ecuador/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/ecuador/kenya/">Ecuador vs Kenya: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.