Brunei vs New Caledonia: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Brunei
260.91
in 2009
New Caledonia
258.84
in 2023
Brunei rank
74th
New Caledonia rank
75th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Brunei
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 260.91 against 258.84 in New Caledonia, a difference of 2.07.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Brunei ranks 74th and New Caledonia ranks 75th of 192 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 114.55 | 243.66 | 129.12 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 166.79 | 218.41 | 51.62 | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 210.59 | 193.55 | 17.04 | Brunei |
| 1990s | 234.73 | 134.09 | 100.65 | Brunei |
| 2000s | 252.74 | 192.32 | 60.42 | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Brunei or New Caledonia?
- Brunei, at 260.91 against 258.84 in New Caledonia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Brunei and New Caledonia?
- 2.07, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and New Caledonia?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
- How do Brunei and New Caledonia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Brunei ranks 74th and New Caledonia ranks 75th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.