Botswana vs South Korea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Botswana
127.79 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
South Korea
131.68 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Botswana rank
153rd
South Korea rank
150th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Botswana
  • South Korea
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 131.68 kilograms per year per capita against 127.79 kilograms per year per capita in Botswana, a difference of 3.89 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 153rd and South Korea ranks 150th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 33.84 kilograms per year per capita 23.59 kilograms per year per capita 10.26 kilograms per year per capita Botswana
1970s 38.98 kilograms per year per capita 43.68 kilograms per year per capita 4.69 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
1980s 46.26 kilograms per year per capita 93.61 kilograms per year per capita 47.35 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
1990s 117 kilograms per year per capita 164.3 kilograms per year per capita 47.3 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2000s 138.55 kilograms per year per capita 193.22 kilograms per year per capita 54.66 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2010s 85.08 kilograms per year per capita 162.57 kilograms per year per capita 77.48 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2020s 122.85 kilograms per year per capita 138.04 kilograms per year per capita 15.19 kilograms per year per capita South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Botswana or South Korea?
South Korea, at 131.68 kilograms per year per capita against 127.79 kilograms per year per capita in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Botswana and South Korea?
3.89 kilograms per year per capita, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and South Korea rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Botswana ranks 153rd and South Korea ranks 150th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs South Korea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/botswana/korea-rep/">Botswana vs South Korea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.