Bolivia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Bolivia
233.31 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Indonesia
233.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bolivia rank
92nd
Indonesia rank
91st

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Bolivia
  • Indonesia
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 233.94 kilograms per year per capita against 233.31 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia, a difference of 0.63 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 92nd and Indonesia ranks 91st of 192 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 201.89 kilograms per year per capita 63.03 kilograms per year per capita 138.86 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1970s 235.39 kilograms per year per capita 68.99 kilograms per year per capita 166.4 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1980s 221.46 kilograms per year per capita 74.07 kilograms per year per capita 147.39 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1990s 243.6 kilograms per year per capita 84.79 kilograms per year per capita 158.81 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
2000s 213.34 kilograms per year per capita 146.61 kilograms per year per capita 66.73 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
2010s 224.69 kilograms per year per capita 171.32 kilograms per year per capita 53.36 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
2020s 239.92 kilograms per year per capita 220.86 kilograms per year per capita 19.06 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Bolivia or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 233.94 kilograms per year per capita against 233.31 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Bolivia and Indonesia?
0.63 kilograms per year per capita, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Indonesia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Bolivia ranks 92nd and Indonesia ranks 91st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bolivia/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bolivia/indonesia/">Bolivia vs Indonesia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.