Barbados vs Guinea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Barbados
282.65 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guinea
283.43 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Barbados rank
64th
Guinea rank
63rd

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Barbados
  • Guinea
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 283.43 kilograms per year per capita against 282.65 kilograms per year per capita in Barbados, a difference of 0.78 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Barbados ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 63rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 117.4 kilograms per year per capita 297.52 kilograms per year per capita 180.13 kilograms per year per capita Guinea
1970s 143.71 kilograms per year per capita 292.95 kilograms per year per capita 149.24 kilograms per year per capita Guinea
1980s 195 kilograms per year per capita 296.41 kilograms per year per capita 101.4 kilograms per year per capita Guinea
1990s 223.12 kilograms per year per capita 305.6 kilograms per year per capita 82.49 kilograms per year per capita Guinea
2000s 313.71 kilograms per year per capita 293.04 kilograms per year per capita 20.67 kilograms per year per capita Barbados
2010s 303.09 kilograms per year per capita 259.69 kilograms per year per capita 43.4 kilograms per year per capita Barbados
2020s 294.55 kilograms per year per capita 272.03 kilograms per year per capita 22.52 kilograms per year per capita Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Barbados or Guinea?
Guinea, at 283.43 kilograms per year per capita against 282.65 kilograms per year per capita in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Barbados and Guinea?
0.78 kilograms per year per capita, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Guinea rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Barbados ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 63rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guinea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/barbados/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/barbados/guinea/">Barbados vs Guinea: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.