Argentina vs Hong Kong: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Argentina
203.06
in 2023
Hong Kong
205.69
in 2023
Argentina rank
114th
Hong Kong rank
112th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Argentina
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 205.69 against 203.06 in Argentina, a difference of 2.63.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 114th and Hong Kong ranks 112th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 209.72 | 139.83 | 69.89 | Argentina |
| 1970s | 259.92 | 196.59 | 63.33 | Argentina |
| 1980s | 223.63 | 208.33 | 15.3 | Argentina |
| 1990s | 248.48 | 240.69 | 7.79 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 230.23 | 235.1 | 4.87 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 220.53 | 232.78 | 12.24 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 209.36 | 210.37 | 1.01 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Argentina or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 205.69 against 203.06 in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Argentina and Hong Kong?
- 2.63, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Hong Kong?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Hong Kong rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Argentina ranks 114th and Hong Kong ranks 112th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.