Voice and Accountability in Niger
Niger: Voice and Accountability was 0.1293 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Niger, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, voice and accountability in Niger stood at 0.1293 standard error.
The figure is up 0.3% on the previous year and down 44.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Niger peaked at 0.2606 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1283 standard error, in 2008.
Niger ranks 19th of 53 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Niger, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2441 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2606 standard error | +6.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2323 standard error | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 0.1761 standard error | -24.2% |
| 2003 | 0.1736 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1858 standard error | +7.1% |
| 2005 | 0.1778 standard error | -4.3% |
| 2006 | 0.1301 standard error | -26.8% |
| 2007 | 0.1283 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2008 | 0.1283 standard error | -0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.1319 standard error | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 0.1289 standard error | -2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.1293 standard error | +0.3% |
Niger compared with similar countries
- Niger's 0.1293 standard error is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.1175 standard error, 1.1× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Niger's 0.1293 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2523 standard error | 0.2441 standard error | 0.2606 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1627 standard error | 0.1283 standard error | 0.2323 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1291 standard error | 0.1289 standard error | 0.1293 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Niger
More reference data data for Niger
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2425 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8132 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3983 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 37.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.1 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Niger?
- Voice and accountability in Niger was 0.1293 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Niger?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2606 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Niger?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1283 standard error in 2008.
- How does Niger rank for voice and accountability?
- Niger ranks 19th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Niger?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Niger data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.