Central African Republic vs Niger: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Central African Republic
- Niger
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.1336 standard error against 0.1293 standard error in Niger, a difference of 0.0043 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Niger ranks 19th of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.2523 standard error | 0.0457 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.1768 standard error | 0.1627 standard error | 0.0141 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1334 standard error | 0.1291 standard error | 0.0043 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Central African Republic or Niger?
- Central African Republic, at 0.1336 standard error against 0.1293 standard error in Niger as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Central African Republic and Niger?
- 0.0043 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Niger?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Niger rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Niger ranks 19th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.