Voice and Accountability in Mozambique
Mozambique: Voice and Accountability was 0.111 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Mozambique, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability in Mozambique is 0.111 standard error, measured in 2011.
That represents a change of up 1.1% on the previous year and down 47.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Mozambique peaked at 0.2318 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1091 standard error, in 2009.
That places Mozambique 42nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2211 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2318 standard error | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2116 standard error | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.1655 standard error | -21.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1582 standard error | -4.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1507 standard error | -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.1434 standard error | -4.9% |
| 2006 | 0.1096 standard error | -23.5% |
| 2007 | 0.1117 standard error | +1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.1096 standard error | -1.9% |
| 2009 | 0.1091 standard error | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 0.1098 standard error | +0.6% |
| 2011 | 0.111 standard error | +1.1% |
Mozambique compared with similar countries
- Mozambique's 0.111 standard error is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.1175 standard error, 94% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Mozambique's 0.111 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 89% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2211 standard error | 0.2318 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.141 standard error | 0.1091 standard error | 0.2116 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1104 standard error | 0.1098 standard error | 0.111 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
More reference data data for Mozambique
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.53 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Mozambique?
- Voice and accountability in Mozambique was 0.111 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2318 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1091 standard error in 2009.
- How does Mozambique rank for voice and accountability?
- Mozambique ranks 42nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.